Islamabad, Feb 27: Pakistan’s defence minister said that his country ran out of “patience” and considers that there is now an “open war” with Afghanistan, after both countries launched strikes following an Afghan cross-border attack.

In a post on X, Defence Minister Khawaja Mohammad Asif said Pakistan had hoped for peace in Afghanistan after the withdrawal of NATO forces and expected the Taliban to focus on the welfare of the Afghan people and regional stability…”

“Our patience has now run out. Now it is open war between us,” he said.

The latest escalation of violence between the neighbouring countries makes a Qatar-mediated ceasefire appear increasingly shaky. The Pakistani defense minister didn’t mention the ceasefire.

Kabul, Feb 26: Afghanistan’s military launched an attack Thursday on Pakistan to retaliate for Pakistani airstrikes on Afghan border areas earlier in the week, claiming to have captured more than a dozen Pakistani army posts in the latest escalation of violence between the volatile neighbours.

Pakistan’s government, which had described Sunday’s airstrikes as an attack on militants harboured in the area, confirmed clashes were taking place Thursday along the border but dismissed claims that army posts had been captured. It called Afghanistan’s attacks Thursday unprovoked.

Afghanistan’s military corps in the east said in a statement that “heavy clashes” had begun Thursday night “in response to the recent airstrikes carried out by Pakistani forces” in eastern Afghanistan.

“In response to the repeated rebellions and insurrections of the Pakistani military, large-scale offensive operations were launched against Pakistani military bases and military installations along the Durand Line,” Afghan government spokesman Zabihullah Mujahid said in a post on X Thursday night.

The two countries’ 2,611-kilometre long border is known as the Durand Line, which Afghanistan has not formally recognised.

Afghanistan’s Defense Ministry said the retaliatory attacks were occurring along the border in five provinces, and said 17 Pakistani army posts had been captured and 40 soldiers killed, with the bodies of 13 taken into Afghanistan.

Mujahid, the government spokesman, said in a post on X that some Pakistani soldiers had been captured alive. There was no official response from Pakistan on the claims of casualties or of soldiers being captured.

In Pakistan, spokesman Mosharraf Ali Zaidi for Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif denied that any Pakistani soldiers had been killed or captured, and that any Pakistani posts had been captured or damaged. He said Pakistani forces had instead inflicted heavy losses along the Pakistan-Afghanistan border in response to what he said were unprovoked Taliban attacks.

“As of right now, there have been no Pakistani soldiers captured, nor any Pakistani soldiers martyred. Any claims of damage to Pakistan thus far are little more than the fantasy of India’s proxies in Afghanistan,” Zaidi said.

Pakistan’s Information Ministry said in a post on X that Afghanistan had opened “unprovoked fire” at multiple locations along the Pakistan-Afghanistan border in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa province and that the action was being met with an “immediate and effective response” from Pakistan’s security forces.

It said early reports indicated heavy casualties on the Afghan side and that multiple posts and pieces of equipment had been destroyed.

“Pakistan will take all necessary measures to ensure its territorial integrity and the safety and security of its citizens,” the statement said.

Afghanistan’s military released video footage of military vehicles moving at night, and the sound of heavy gunfire. The video could not be independently verified.

Tension has been high between the two neighbours for months, with deadly border clashes in October killing dozens of soldiers, civilians and suspected militants. The violence followed explosions in Kabul that Afghan officials blamed on Pakistan. Islamabad, at the time, conducted strikes deep inside Afghanistan to target militant hideouts.

A Qatari-mediated ceasefire between the two countries has largely held, but the two sides have still occasionally traded fire across the border. Several rounds of peace talks in November failed to produce a formal agreement.

On Sunday, Pakistan’s military carried out strikes along the border with Afghanistan, saying it had killed at least 70 militants.

Afghanistan rejected the claim, saying dozens of civilians had been killed, including women and children. The Defence Ministry said “various civilian areas” in eastern Afghanistan had been hit, including a religious madrassa and several homes. The ministry said the strikes were a violation of Afghanistan’s airspace and sovereignty.

Hours before Thursday’s border clashes erupted, Pakistan’s Foreign Ministry spokesperson Tahir Andrabi defended the military’s early Sunday strikes on what he described as training camps of the Pakistani Taliban along the Afghan border.

At a weekly news conference in Islamabad on Thursday, he said those “precision strikes were carried out” in response to recent militant attacks in Pakistan. Andrabi said Pakistan “remains cognizant of the threats that emanate from Afghanistan.”

He said attacks inside Pakistan, which he blamed on “Khawarij,” a term the government uses for the Pakistani Taliban, have increased over the past year.

“We have nothing against the people of Afghanistan,” Andrabi said.

Militant violence has surged in Pakistan in recent years, much of which Pakistan blames on the Pakistani Taliban, or TTP, and outlawed Baloch separatist groups. The TTP is separate from but closely allied with Afghanistan’s Taliban. Islamabad accuses the TTP of operating from inside Afghanistan, a charge both the group and Kabul deny.

New Delhi, Feb 27: Negotiators from Iran and the United States have concluded a third round of indirect talks over Tehran’s nuclear programme in Geneva, with both sides reporting progress and agreeing to continue discussions in Vienna, Austria next week.

The high-stakes negotiations, mediated by Oman, were held amid mounting regional tensions and concerns that failure to reach an understanding could escalate into military confrontation. The next round is expected to take place in Vienna, Austria, perhaps along with the technical-level discussions scheduled perhaps on Monday, March 2 as reported by he international media.

Omani Foreign Minister Badr al-Busaidi, who facilitated the talks, said to media that the two sides had made “significant progress” and described what he termed unprecedented flexibility from the American side. He indicated that consultations would now take place in both capitals before negotiations resume “soon”.

Iran’s delegation was led by Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi, who said the parties were “close” on many issues and more serious about reaching a settlement than in previous rounds of diplomacy. He described the discussions as constructive, saying agreement had been reached on certain points while differences persisted on others. He confirmed that the next round of talks would be held in less than a week.

Tehran said “important” and “practical” proposals were advanced during the latest session concerning Iran’s nuclear activities and the potential lifting of sanctions. According to Iranian state media, as reported by the international media negotiators reaffirmed Iran’s right to peaceful nuclear energy. Iran is also believed to have opposed proposals requiring the transfer abroad of Iran’s stockpile of approximately 400 kilograms of enriched uranium.

However, reports indicate that Iranian officials may have put forward some concessions, though details have not been made public. One reported option under discussion would allow Iran to resume uranium enrichment at minimal levels after a suspension period of three to five years, subject to international monitoring.

In return, Iran has sought the removal of economic sanctions that have strained its economy. Abbas Araghchi said to regional media that sanctions relief was a central demand in exchange for any nuclear limitations.

The outcome of the negotiations may also hinge on the role of the International Atomic Energy Agency. Rafael Mariano Grossi, Director General of the International Atomic Energy Agency, is expected to play a key role in any future monitoring or verification arrangements should a framework agreement be reached.

While both sides have characterised the talks as productive, officials acknowledged that critical differences still remain, and the prospects for a comprehensive deal remain still uncertain.